The Climate Skeptic

The Climate Skeptic

Brussels is Building a Climate Protection Racket in the Name of ‘Climate Insurance’

The EU’s claim that "insurance as usual is not sustainable" is nonsense

Tilak Doshi
Sep 15, 2026
∙ Paid

Kurt Vandenberghe, the European Commission’s Director-General for Climate Action, put the new orthodoxy in a single sentence this month. Posting after a round table with Europe’s insurers on closing the “climate protection gap”, he declared that “insurance as usual will not be sustainable”. Climate policy, he argued, is now effectively insurance policy too: whatever risk insurers decline to cover becomes uninvestable. According to Vandenberghe, a widening protection gap threatens a looming financial-stability problem for the whole European Union.

In April, the Financial Times pushed the same idea, reporting that EU insurance, pensions and financial regulators want a Brussels-backed fund of €10 billion–€65 billion for natural and climate disasters “to close the bloc’s insurance gap for floods, wildfires, heatwaves and storms”. The figures behind the pitch are stark: only €4.5 billion of the €11 billion in losses from the 2024 Valencia floods were insured; only €13 billion of the €51 billion in losses from the 2021 Ahr valley floods were covered. Natural catastrophes, the regulators said, caused more than €900 billion in damage across the EU between 1981 and 2024 — “only a fraction” of it insured.

Brussels has decided that Europe’s storms and bad weather need a new bureaucracy. The Financial Times report drew on a joint discussion paper published that same day by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. It proposed a continent-wide natural catastrophe insurance pool, backed by a loan facility of up to €65 billion, that would supposedly shrink Europe’s “insurance protection gap” from roughly 75% to about 10%. The pool would be financed by risk-based premiums backstopped, ultimately, by the EU’s own credit.

Spain did not wait long to raise the stakes. In a letter to Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra sent on September 2nd 2026, Madrid’s ecological transition ministry proposed a permanent European Climate Adaptation Fund financed by a tax on oil and gas company profits, common EU debt instruments and a public-private reinsurance system issuing “climate risk bonds”. Madrid’s own tally: €822 billion in weather and climate losses across the EU since 1980, with roughly a quarter of that concentrated in just the four years from 2021 to 2024.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Toby Young.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
Tilak Doshi's avatar
A guest post by
Tilak Doshi
I am a PhD economist with a focus on energy and environment policy issues. I am the energy editor at the Daily Sceptic and live in London.
Subscribe to Tilak
© 2026 Toby Young · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture