"the unproven suggestion that any current global warming was mostly caused by humans burning hydrocarbons"
Nothing's ever proven in science but the IPCC states that the recent warming is unequivocally the result of human activity and even back in 2006 they said the observed warming trend was "very likely" the result of human activity.
Nowadays you end up at the doors of opportunistic and/or virtue signalling oligarchs, such as Gates, Soros or Christopher Hohn. They've all been in on the Green Blob gravy train while the going is good and there's plenty of public money sloshing around, waiting for them to hoover up.
Interestingly, Gates seems to now be disavowing the whole Nut Zero boondoogle, and stating that it's not the end of the world as we know it after all! Presumably he can see that the gravy train is about to derail.
Bill Gates says “Climate change is serious, but we’ve made great progress. We need to keep backing the breakthroughs that will help the world reach zero emissions.”
Made what progress?? The cumulative use of fossil fuels globally has, and continues, to increase, despite the token efforts of 'zero emissions' fantasists.
The net effect of attempting to use 'unreliables' has been to hobble the economies of a number of Western countries, especially Britain and Germany. We and our children will suffer the consequences of this for decades.
The emissions of most developed countries have come down and many of those with the lowest emissions have large proportions of nuclear in their energy mix. Germany made a huge mistake in shutting down nuclear reactors.
We’ve long known that the emissions of developing countries would increase as they industrialise. The progress we’ve made is that globally the rise in emissions has been less than looked likely a decade or so ago. We’re therefore less likely to hit the worst case scenarios.
No you don’t end up at fossil fuel companies you really have swallowed the alarmist propaganda hook line and sinker if you follow the money you end up at the WEF, and the rest of the globalists like Bill Gates, George Soros and their ilk alongside the late unlamented USAID and furthermore if you look into the finances of climate sceptics you will find most are very poorly funded and because the global left elites control the MSM like the BBC and any discussion of climate is entirely one sided entirely promoting the alarmist viewpoint. Thankfully the tide is now turning and the elites have been rumbled for the criminal grifters they are and the man in the street is proving to be far more intelligent than they ever thought and hopefully there should be consequences for those that deliberately tried to mislead us.
What the IPPC claim and what is proven are not the same you have been drinking the alarmist coolaid too long and you need to expand your research outside the alarmist bubble where you will find that the science is most definitely not settled and the the guff coming from the alarmists is based on warped computer models and not real world data.
Nothing is proven in science. You can never be 100% certain, but we can be about 99% certain that the planet is warming and that the warming is primarily caused by human activity. That’s not just the view of the IPCC, it’s the view of every scientific academy because it’s supported by widespread evidence.
No it’s not that’s an absolute lie it’s definitely not supported by every scientific academy the planet is warming by natural climate change which has been happening for around 4.7 billion years what you are presenting is the exact propaganda the BBC has been pushing for 20 years or more. Anthropogenic global warming accounts for such a small amount of warming it almost immeasurable. You are part of the climate alarmist lie machine.
“The evidence for global warming due to human influence has been recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries.”
Wikipedia!!!??! Are you serious??!? That’s a censored platform where any climate skepticism is taken down you buffoon here an actual fact currently the planet is warming (empirically measured) at a rate of 0.13 degrees per decade of which an unknown proportion may due to human activity at that rate it will be 2126 before the temperature rises by a whole degree that’s well within the normal range of Climate variability. By the way that figure is from NASA research by Dr Roy Spencer. Wikipedia is owned and edited by the globalist progressive left.
If you think that Wikipedia piece is wrong all you need to do is link to a statement by one of the national science academies of a major industrialised nation denying the evidence for global warming due to human influence. That won't be the Royal Society. Here's what they say: "Greenhouse gases emitted by human activities alter Earth’s energy balance and thus its climate." https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/basics-of-climate-change/
By the way, the planet has already warmed by 1.1 degrees since industrialisation.`
And here's what NASA has to say: "Scientists demonstrated the heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases in the mid-19th century.2 Many of the science instruments NASA uses to study our climate focus on how these gases affect the movement of infrared radiation through the atmosphere. From the measured impacts of increases in these gases, there is no question that increased greenhouse gas levels warm Earth in response."
"the unproven suggestion that any current global warming was mostly caused by humans burning hydrocarbons"
Nothing's ever proven in science but the IPCC states that the recent warming is unequivocally the result of human activity and even back in 2006 they said the observed warming trend was "very likely" the result of human activity.
The IPCC is a politically corrupted organisation, in the same ilk as the BBC, which has been so clearly exposed as such this week.
Do a bit of research outside your bubble, and follow the money...
If you follow the money don’t you end up at the doors of the fossil fuel companies?
Nowadays you end up at the doors of opportunistic and/or virtue signalling oligarchs, such as Gates, Soros or Christopher Hohn. They've all been in on the Green Blob gravy train while the going is good and there's plenty of public money sloshing around, waiting for them to hoover up.
Interestingly, Gates seems to now be disavowing the whole Nut Zero boondoogle, and stating that it's not the end of the world as we know it after all! Presumably he can see that the gravy train is about to derail.
Bill Gates says “Climate change is serious, but we’ve made great progress. We need to keep backing the breakthroughs that will help the world reach zero emissions.”
https://www.gatesnotes.com/home/home-page-topic/reader/three-tough-truths-about-climate
He doesn’t agree with the doomers but neither does he agree with the deniers.
Made what progress?? The cumulative use of fossil fuels globally has, and continues, to increase, despite the token efforts of 'zero emissions' fantasists.
The net effect of attempting to use 'unreliables' has been to hobble the economies of a number of Western countries, especially Britain and Germany. We and our children will suffer the consequences of this for decades.
The emissions of most developed countries have come down and many of those with the lowest emissions have large proportions of nuclear in their energy mix. Germany made a huge mistake in shutting down nuclear reactors.
We’ve long known that the emissions of developing countries would increase as they industrialise. The progress we’ve made is that globally the rise in emissions has been less than looked likely a decade or so ago. We’re therefore less likely to hit the worst case scenarios.
No you don’t end up at fossil fuel companies you really have swallowed the alarmist propaganda hook line and sinker if you follow the money you end up at the WEF, and the rest of the globalists like Bill Gates, George Soros and their ilk alongside the late unlamented USAID and furthermore if you look into the finances of climate sceptics you will find most are very poorly funded and because the global left elites control the MSM like the BBC and any discussion of climate is entirely one sided entirely promoting the alarmist viewpoint. Thankfully the tide is now turning and the elites have been rumbled for the criminal grifters they are and the man in the street is proving to be far more intelligent than they ever thought and hopefully there should be consequences for those that deliberately tried to mislead us.
What the IPPC claim and what is proven are not the same you have been drinking the alarmist coolaid too long and you need to expand your research outside the alarmist bubble where you will find that the science is most definitely not settled and the the guff coming from the alarmists is based on warped computer models and not real world data.
Nothing is proven in science. You can never be 100% certain, but we can be about 99% certain that the planet is warming and that the warming is primarily caused by human activity. That’s not just the view of the IPCC, it’s the view of every scientific academy because it’s supported by widespread evidence.
No it’s not that’s an absolute lie it’s definitely not supported by every scientific academy the planet is warming by natural climate change which has been happening for around 4.7 billion years what you are presenting is the exact propaganda the BBC has been pushing for 20 years or more. Anthropogenic global warming accounts for such a small amount of warming it almost immeasurable. You are part of the climate alarmist lie machine.
“The evidence for global warming due to human influence has been recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change
Wikipedia!!!??! Are you serious??!? That’s a censored platform where any climate skepticism is taken down you buffoon here an actual fact currently the planet is warming (empirically measured) at a rate of 0.13 degrees per decade of which an unknown proportion may due to human activity at that rate it will be 2126 before the temperature rises by a whole degree that’s well within the normal range of Climate variability. By the way that figure is from NASA research by Dr Roy Spencer. Wikipedia is owned and edited by the globalist progressive left.
If you think that Wikipedia piece is wrong all you need to do is link to a statement by one of the national science academies of a major industrialised nation denying the evidence for global warming due to human influence. That won't be the Royal Society. Here's what they say: "Greenhouse gases emitted by human activities alter Earth’s energy balance and thus its climate." https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/basics-of-climate-change/
By the way, the planet has already warmed by 1.1 degrees since industrialisation.`
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/grantham/publications/climate-change-faqs/how-do-we-know-climate-change-is-happening/
And here's what NASA has to say: "Scientists demonstrated the heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases in the mid-19th century.2 Many of the science instruments NASA uses to study our climate focus on how these gases affect the movement of infrared radiation through the atmosphere. From the measured impacts of increases in these gases, there is no question that increased greenhouse gas levels warm Earth in response."
https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/