5 Comments
User's avatar
Patrick Frank's avatar

Thank-you. I've read your post about CO2 and warming, and agree with you.

The whole CO2-warming argument rests on the assumption that nothing else changes - that CO2 is the only actor.

The assumption is nonsense, and the entire scare rests on climate models that produce physically meaningless air temperature projections.

the betrayal of integrity among the scientific societies, including the APS and the National Academy, is outrageous and worse than shameful.

Peter W's avatar

Great article, thanks.

One thing that gets overlooked is that all these inaccuracies are easily corrected by applying hubris to the inputs!

Tuco's Child's avatar

Nice job ! => I am a fellow chemist. 101 Principles.

You might like this:

Why CO₂ Cannot Warm the Atmosphere or Earth

https://substack.com/@tucoschild247601/note/c-271217410

Nigel King's avatar

My computation using the measurement of the last 45 years demonstrates that the co2 is coming from the temperature rather than the other way around. The is shown in my Substack https://nigelkingify.substack.com/p/co2-vs-ocean-temperature-correlation

Charles Exley's avatar

Great article that I have circulated widely. Thanks. I think it’s actually a common problem. My suspicion is that education doesn’t necessarily increase intelligence so although we have more graduates they are lower quality. I see it all the time, the idea that because a super computer has generated a range of outcomes somehow the central scenario is validated whereas you can usually predict the median using a pencil and paper for a set of recurrence equations and all that is important is your choice of central parameters, which seems to be the assumed CO2 forcing in climate models.