Great article that I have circulated widely. Thanks. I think it’s actually a common problem. My suspicion is that education doesn’t necessarily increase intelligence so although we have more graduates they are lower quality. I see it all the time, the idea that because a super computer has generated a range of outcomes somehow the central scenario is validated whereas you can usually predict the median using a pencil and paper for a set of recurrence equations and all that is important is your choice of central parameters, which seems to be the assumed CO2 forcing in climate models.
Great article, thanks.
One thing that gets overlooked is that all these inaccuracies are easily corrected by applying hubris to the inputs!
My computation using the measurement of the last 45 years demonstrates that the co2 is coming from the temperature rather than the other way around. The is shown in my Substack https://nigelkingify.substack.com/p/co2-vs-ocean-temperature-correlation
Great article that I have circulated widely. Thanks. I think it’s actually a common problem. My suspicion is that education doesn’t necessarily increase intelligence so although we have more graduates they are lower quality. I see it all the time, the idea that because a super computer has generated a range of outcomes somehow the central scenario is validated whereas you can usually predict the median using a pencil and paper for a set of recurrence equations and all that is important is your choice of central parameters, which seems to be the assumed CO2 forcing in climate models.